Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Thu Aug 14, 2025 11:55 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:09 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
bluescreek wrote:
On the compression rods , they do not rely on pushing on the neck , they are strictly in tension and like a bow string , as they are tightened they cause the bow in the neck. A simple but great design. A channel 1 way rod is a push style , as you tighten it , it bows and pushes on the neck and fretboard.


John: Don't have much faith in straight compression rods. However a single rod bent into a bow high at head stock and high at the body and low in the center of the neck with a wood insert on top of rod is an excellent design and puts more desirable stresses on the neck. Think Gibson may have used this at one time. Just my opinion of course.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 1:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:14 am
Posts: 819
First name: Tim
Last Name: Lynch
City: Santa Cruz
Zip/Postal Code: 95060
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Double Action compression rods. Stainless Steel and lightweight, no blow outs


Attachment:
DATR (640x480).jpg


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:13 pm
Posts: 835
Location: Durango CO
First name: Dave
Last Name: Farmer
City: Durango
State: CO
Tim L, I don't want to highjack the thread but I have been thinking of drilling my surface plate for a vacuum line for a long time. Did you drill those yourself?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:10 pm
Posts: 2764
First name: Tom
Last Name: West
State: Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Tim: Nice looking rods. The one problem with compression rods in my mind is the very fact they compress....!! There have been necks that developed an "S" shape due to the length wise compression. Single bent rods want to straight out when tightened and don't cause the "S" shape to form. Not that it happens all the time with the straight compression rods but it can happen.
Tom

_________________
A person who has never made a mistake has never made anything!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:44 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:17 am
Posts: 1292
First name: John
Last Name: Arnold
City: Newport
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37821
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
I like single action rods. I never have had a need for dual action on the guitars or necks I have made. On necks with an adjustable rod, I make every effort to have a dead straight neck with the frets installed and no string tension. That way, I always end up with a bit of tension on the rod to counteract the string pull.
Quote:
Don't have much faith in straight compression rods. However a single rod bent into a bow high at head stock and high at the body and low in the center of the neck with a wood insert on top of rod is an excellent design and puts more desirable stresses on the neck. Think Gibson may have used this at one time. Just my opinion of course.

Nearly all the simple compression rods I have used have been that design (concave up). The aluminum channel rods (Martin, Gotoh) work on the same principle. A variation on the aluminum channel is where the channel is made of carbon fiber or a hard wood like black locust. Using a channel helps eliminate the problem of the simple rod's anchor burying in the soft mahogany.
I don't do many adjustable rods on the guitars I am building these days. I use a steel tee bar, or simple carbon fiber reinforcement.

_________________
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2015 2:13 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:14 am
Posts: 819
First name: Tim
Last Name: Lynch
City: Santa Cruz
Zip/Postal Code: 95060
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
David, the surface plate is on a CMM. I did not drill or put the inserts into the granite. That is the way it came from the factory.

Tom the rods are put in deep into the neck. The size of the anchors determines that depth. Neck with fretted fingerboard are dead flat and the rod is slack before stringing, there is no pre load. Slot for the rod is to size and then back filled with a mahogany strip. i think that if there was any problem with an S shape the people who use these rods would have certainly said something by now. Traugott and Claxton have been using these rods for years as well as SCGC. SC switched to bending type rods but after repeated blow outs switched back to these.
They don't have a lot of range, but if your neck is seasoned and flat you don't need much. Once again there is no need for pre loading.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: J De Rocher, TimAllen and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com